Re: Five nights at freddy's mod coming soon
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 7:08 pm
updated the thread
CLgaming wrote:And that is what the FNaF community is like. Making things that have practically been already made by other people. (*cough*fivenightsatwaltdisneys*cough*)
All in all, it's a community that is just as bad as, if not worse than, Minecraft. Both games are good. Both communities are [EXPECTIVE REDACTED] horsecrap loads of barnacles.
Excuse me?(*cough*fivenightsatwaltdisneys*cough*)
Firstly, just because he/she took screenshots using I6NIS's models doesn't mean either he/she's going to use them in the mod release or his/her WIP model is a red flag. You don't use WIP models in WIP code; you use placeholder models for that. Sure I6NIS's license forces attribution, but I wouldn't sweat over that since their use is secondary (not released as part of the mod). In fact, there's no release whatsoever.Really funny how you show a screenshot of a Chica model YOU made, but then you go ahead and port I6NIS's models (without permission I presume).
Wrong. Eh I'll just post an argument here so I don't have to give justifications on another post - FNaF has some excellent fanart, which has gone well beyond the games themselves. Same as Minecraft, by the way, just instead of (just) fanart, they have mods. What you said is actually quite insultive. PS: Do your research Syphen.And that is what the FNaF community is like. Making things that have practically been already made by other people. (*cough*fivenightsatwaltdisneys*cough*)
The communities are bad, I agree. But for different reasons. Also my previous answer.All in all, it's a community that is just as bad as, if not worse than, Minecraft.
The cause of the effect.(...) I presume (...)
I both agree and disagree; FNAF has some excellent fanart... some. I visit the /r/fivenightsatfreddys subreddit frequently and you see so much shit on there, but the other day I saw a genuinely good painting of one of the animatronics. Without a doubt, their community- on average- sucks, but as always there are outliers.Hakkla wrote:Wrong. Eh I'll just post an argument here so I don't have to give justifications on another post - FNaF has some excellent fanart, which has gone well beyond the games themselves. Same as Minecraft, by the way, just instead of (just) fanart, they have mods. What you said is actually quite insultive. PS: Do your research Syphen.And that is what the FNaF community is like. Making things that have practically been already made by other people. (*cough*fivenightsatwaltdisneys*cough*)
Agreed, but it is worth mentioning that lancethegamer has not specified any of this information at all, and we must therefore assume he is using those models in his final version. However- again- there is no release, so no issue.Hakkla wrote:Firstly, just because he/she took screenshots using I6NIS's models doesn't mean either he/she's going to use them in the mod release or his/her WIP model is a red flag. You don't use WIP models in WIP code; you use placeholder models for that. Sure I6NIS's license forces attribution, but I wouldn't sweat over that since their use is secondary (not released as part of the mod). In fact, there's no release whatsoever.Really funny how you show a screenshot of a Chica model YOU made, but then you go ahead and port I6NIS's models (without permission I presume).
Hakkla wrote:PS: Do your research Syphen.
I know, Five Nights at Treasure Island. I played it, it was cool.InnocentSam wrote:FYI, Syphen, the mod is not called Five Nights at Walt Disney's, it's called Five Night's at Treasure Island and actually seems to be one of the better things to come from the FNAF community.
Going back a page, I see it was CL who made the name mistake, not you 3am programming does that to you..SyphenTV wrote:I know, Five Nights at Treasure Island. I played it, it was cool.
CLgaming wrote:Actually, I remember seeing a name saying Five Nights at Walt Disney's somewhere on this forum.
Then again, I never looked into it much.